Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Deal v. Department of Prison Records et al
as 5:2018ct03086
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Prison Records, Health Department Records, Department of Prison Combined Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
PAULA SMITH, KENNTH PRICE, JR., BEVERLY PERDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deal v. Easley et al
as 5:2018ct03077
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Easley, Beverly Perdue, Pat McCrory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Butler et al
as 5:2015ct03274
Plaintiff:
Ferris R. Langley
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE, KENNETH PRICE, JR, BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Butler et al
as 5:2014ct03142
Plaintiff:
David Earl Jones
Defendant:
Paul G. Butler, Jr., Willis J. Fowler, Anthony E. Rand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rippy-Bey et al v. North Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Rippy-Bey and The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes
Defendant:
North Carolina, State of, Roy Cooper, Michael F. Easley and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012ct03242
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Young
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Perrit et al
as 5:2012hc02125
Petitioner:
Lewis Pickett
Respondent:
Brad Perrit, Reuben Young and Beverly Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRIEND EL v. PERDUE
as 1:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN L. FRIEND EL
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
