Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIAS et al v. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INS. CO. OF HARTFORD et al
as 2:2016cv06664
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BIAS , HAROLD BIAS , INEZ BIAS and others
Defendant:
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INS. CO. OF HARTFORD and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banks et al v. Cessan et al
as 1:2014cv00955
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Robert Cessan, David Huton, Joy Flowers Conti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit, Director, Office Science & Technology Policy, Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BIAS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv05469
Plaintiff:
CLEVE BIAS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BIAS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36992
Plaintiff:
BERNARD BIAS and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. BECKER et al
as 2:2011cv01796
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN E. BECKER, BIA SALES, INC., MICHAEL MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIAS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69763
Plaintiff:
BERNARD BIAS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
