Cases 1 - 10 of 1,171
Desouze v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Captain Williams, Sargent Dixon, Pearl Legendre Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILING ERROR
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jillian Harrod
Defendant:
Llano County Sheriff's Office, Llano County, Texas, Bill Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harrod v. Llano County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Jillian Harrod
Defendant:
Llano County Sheriff's Office, Llano County, Texas, Bill Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Starr v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Starr
Defendant:
Bill Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Knoll v. Watt et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Keith Knoll
Defendant:
Tom Watt, Kristina Bowen and Bill Magers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00562
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easter v. Court Room 485th District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jordan Easter and Jordan Beavers
Defendant:
Court Room 485th District Court, Judge Steven James and DA Jamie Jernigan
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
