Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Connell v. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
Plaintiff:
David O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bishop v. Boychuck et al
as 1:2018cv00457
Defendant:
Paul Boychuck and Echo United Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Del Sesto et al v. Prospect CharterCARE, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00328
Defendant:
The Angell Pension Group, Inc., CharterCARE Community Board, Roman Catholic Bishop of Providence and others
Plaintiff:
Caroll Short, Gail J Major, Stephen Del Sesto and others
Interested Party:
Michael W Field and Lydia Corvese
Receiver:
THOMAS HEMMENDINGER
Special Master:
Deming E. Sherman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bishop v. American Medical Alert Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Joel Bishop
Defendant:
American Medical Alert Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bishop v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bishop
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ryan et al v. Krause et al
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mary Ryan and Thomas Ryan
Defendant:
Robert D. Krause, Frank Williams, William Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03282
Plaintiff:
James Bishop
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Bishop v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03199
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Bishop
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Bishop v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01991
Plaintiff:
Carol A. Bishop
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
