Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mathews v. Wedemeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
Courtney B. Mathews
Defendant:
Robert Wiley Wedemeyer, Jill Bartee Ayers, Timothy L. Easter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sears v. Sears et al
as 3:2019cv00807
Defendant:
Carma Dennis McGee, Dr. Robert M. Wheatley, Elaine B. Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Anne A. Sears
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Martin v. City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
Rhakim Martin
Defendant:
City of Memphis/Shelby County & Criminal Court, Mary Thomas, Amy Weirich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivins v. USA
as 3:2016cv00706
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tyson Christopher Bivins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hardville v. Moore et al
as 1:2016cv01090
Plaintiff:
Frederick Alexander Hardville
Defendant:
Lee Moore, Phil Bivins and Dyer County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Tennessee et al v. Haslam et al
as 3:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee and Herbert S. Moncier
Defendant:
Bill Haslam , Mark Goins , Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzpatrick et al v. Bivins et al
as 3:2012cv00048
Petitioner:
Walter Fitzpatrick, III and M J Blanchard
Respondent:
Bill Bivins and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bivins v. USA
as 3:2011cv00369
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tyson Christopher Bivins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fincher et al v. Dyer County et al
as 2:2011cv02002
Defendant:
Dyer County , The City of Dyersburg , The City of Newbern and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Fincher and Rodney Fincher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
