Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Blakey v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv01371
Plaintiff:
Leslie Blakey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons d/b/a FCI-Allenwood Low, J.L. Jamison, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BLAKEY v. PISTRO
as 2:2021cv00572
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Petitioner:
LESLIE BLAKEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTZ v. BLAKEY et al
as 2:2020cv04290
Respondent:
PATRICIA MCNAMARA, PATRICIA MAISANO, JOSEPH MEOLA and others
Petitioner:
TRUSTEE EDWARD JAMES ARTZ
BLAKEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv00784
Petitioner:
JAMAAR A. BLAKEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DICKINSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01042
Plaintiff:
JOHN DICKINSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S.C.I. PITTSBURGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKEY v. WENEROWICZ
as 3:2013cv00575
Petitioner:
Michael Blakey
Respondent:
Michael Wenerowicz and Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKEY v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2013cv00996
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BLAKEY
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAKEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2010cv00857
Petitioner:
LESLIE BLAKEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAKEY v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2010cv00750
Plaintiff:
LESLIE C. BLAKEY
Defendant:
JANICE SNYDER, DEBRA ADAMS, NANCY VERNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
