Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Stokes v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Monte Stokes
Defendant:
C.O. Boyd, Sgt. Bowman and Lt. Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 7:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Blankenship
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Burke v. Punturi et al
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burke
Defendant:
Kevin Punturi, VitalCore Health Strategies, LLC, Rajvinder Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Fuller et al
as 7:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Superintendent Shannon Fuller, Major Tracy Davidson, Sr. Prob. Officer Eddie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ellis v. Blakenship
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Craig D. Ellis
Defendant:
Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Blankenship et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Craig Ellis
Defendant:
Ms. Blankenship, A. Hill and Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Yu v. Blankenship et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Henry Yu
Defendant:
Ms. Blankenship, Ms. Blane and Dr. Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert Mckinley Blankenship
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Howard Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Robert Mckinley Blankenship
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
