Cases 11 - 20 of 62
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Timbaktoo Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04869
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Timbaktoo Trucking, Inc. and Ramanbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Why Knot...LLC
as 3:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Why Knot...LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. FATALIYEV
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
ISMAIL FATALIYEV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Capitol Sales Company Inc.
as 1:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Capitol Sales Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. LOVE TRANSPORT INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02863
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
Love Transport Inc. and KAMALDEEP SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. C&H Expedited LLP et al
as 1:2021cv04555
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
C&H Expedited LLP, Lee Castro and Joshua Huffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. BAUMGARTNER et al
as 1:2021cv01807
Defendant:
Curt Dittmaier and Curtis Baumgartner
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC and ROGER CROWDER
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Trans Liner Corp et al
as 2:2021cv00009
Defendant:
TRANS LEASE TRUCKS AND TRAILERS LLC, Mirjana Kuzmanova, TRANS LINER CORP and others
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., v. Lumpkins
as 1:2020cv05642
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.,
Defendant:
Jerry Lumpkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
