Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Sayler v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02722
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Sayler
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDEOUT v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv07000
Plaintiff:
DEVON RIDEOUT
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01005
Plaintiff:
Miranda Perez
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, Takata, Inc., TK Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seals v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24449
Plaintiff:
Marc Seals
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. , Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Back v. TK Holdings, Inc. et al.
as 6:2014cv01388
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Back , John Warren Burge and Lynndon Bais
Defendant:
TK Holdings, Inc., Takata Corporation, Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamora et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv02618
Plaintiff:
Susana Zamora , Jorge Pimentel , Henry Collins and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24009
Plaintiff:
Craig Dunn, Pam Koehler, Zulemarie Rivera and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Dorry Taylor
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., The Hertz Corporation and Chrysler Group LLC
Claimant:
John Randall Futch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burleson v. BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
as 6:2007cv03705
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Burleson and Jeffrey Scott Burleson
Defendant:
BMW Manufacturing Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
