Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boatright v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01091
Petitioner:
Ronald Keith Boatright
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatright v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Ronald Boatright
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatright et al v. Grey et al
as 3:2021cv00835
Plaintiff:
Zach Poindexter and Mark Boatright
Defendant:
Chuck Peoples, Gilley Grey, GEMS911, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective, LLC v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Jason E. Boatright, Kevin J. Lilly, Ida Clement Steen and others
Plaintiff:
CANarchy Craft Brewery Collective, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arroyo et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Carol Arroyo , Kacey Adams , Leke Adewunmi and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Boatright v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Michael Boatright
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Great Southern Life v. Aaron, et al
as 3:2002cv01816
Plaintiff:
Great Southern Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jim Aaron, Trudy Allen, Anthony A Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
