Cases 11 - 20 of 41
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, DENTIST, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BONNER et al
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
BONNER, RUTH MARY SIMS, SARAH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
BYRD, BOBBIE RIGGS and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORAN v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BOBBI RIGGS and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. BYRD, KIM HOBSON, BOBBIE RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILDER
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
TRAE T. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NURSE L. CUPP, HEATHER, ELKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWANN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SWANN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTIE, BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
