Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Donnerson v. Crittenden County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnerson
Defendant:
Crittenden County Detention Center, Jeffery Thomas, T Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Demarius Freeman
Defendant:
Harper, Mitchell, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Torrance Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coleman et al
as 2:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Crittenden County Correctional Facility, Teresa Bonner, Kat Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Drexal Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Gigg Express Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones and Karen Jones
Defendant:
James Bonner and Gigg Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeman v. Childress et al
as 3:2018cv00151
Defendant:
McAuthor, Mandy Childress, Mike Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Demarius Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Advanced Medical Services et al
as 4:2016cv00869
Plaintiff:
Norman Wesley Adams
Defendant:
Advanced Medical Services, Grimes, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Stokes et al
as 4:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Norman W Adams
Defendant:
Stokes, Breckinridge, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. Nationwide Insurance Company Inc
as 3:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Billy Bonner and Crystal Bonner
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
