Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Moss v. Trent et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Moss
Defendant:
Tim Trent, Joshua Salmon, Enochs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Ihara
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Bonner
Defendant:
Christopher J. Ihara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Bonner et al
as 7:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Wesley Eugene Baker
Defendant:
Corpral Bonner, Officer Weston, Major Enoch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Salmon et al
as 7:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
Wesley E. Baker, II
Defendant:
Ofc. Westin, Ann, Ofc. Quill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ann et al
as 7:2021cv00379
Plaintiff:
Wesley E. Baker, II
Defendant:
Ann, Hamlett Smith, Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. SYG Associates, INC et al
as 1:2019cv01514
Defendant:
Susan Webb, SYG Associates, INC and Mary Kathryn Hamill
Plaintiff:
Eliza Bonner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trazell v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Delonte Trazell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Rand Beers, Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Poston v. Kane et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
Allen Wayne Poston
Defendant:
Kane, Tracy Jones, Eric Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ILS International Launch Services, Inc. v. Bonner et al
as 1:2012cv01140
Plaintiff:
ILS International Launch Services, Inc.
Defendant:
James Bonner , Thomas J. Dwyer , Pegasus Global International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Libertarian Party of Virginia et al v. Judd et al
as 3:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
Libertarian Party of Virginia and Darryl Bonner
Defendant:
Charles Judd , Kimberly Bowers and Don Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
