Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Ronald Davis v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-6471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, individual capacity, JOHN CLARK, the former Director of the United States Marshal's Service ("USMS"), individual capacity and HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, the former Director of the BOP, individual capacity
Attanasio v. United States Dept. Justice BOP
as 4:2013cv01954
Petitioner:
Louis Attanasio
Respondent:
United States Dept. Justice BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nathan Smith v. J.C. Holland, et al
as 13-5847
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J.C. HOLLAND, USP McCreary, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, BOP, TAMYRA JARVIS, Warden and others
Embrey v. Sepanek et al
as 0:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
William J.R. Embrey
Defendant:
M. Sepanek, Brian Sparks, Karl Leibee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniel Anita v. Director of Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-4290
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ANITA
Respondent - Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS, J.L. NORWOOD, Regional Director of BOP, R.L. FARLEY and others
Castillo-DeLeon v. Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons - BOP Central Office
as 4:2012cv00186
Petitioner:
Javier Castillo-DeLeon
Respondent:
Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons - BOP Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcus Jones v. BOP, et al
as 11-6091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS DEANGELO JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
BOP, JUAN CASTILLO, Warden, FCI Memphis Warden, S. DAWSON, Assistant Warden and others
Meriweather v. Augustine
as 3:2010cv01192
Petitioner:
Charles E. Meriweather
Respondent:
Paige Augustine, Charles Brown, BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Tony Lee
as 10-1705
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TONY JAMEL LEE, aka Bop
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
