Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Block v. Boncher et al
as 1:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
Amy Boncher, Sincada, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv10306
Plaintiff:
Russell Rose
Defendant:
Unkown, Named Lieutenants, Unkown BOP Correctional Officer, Unkown Federal Bureau of Prisions Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tobin v. BOP District of Northeast Region
as 1:2020cv00605
Petitioner:
Louis B. Tobin
Respondent:
BOP District of Northeast Region
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sellers v. Kazm et al
as 1:2016cv10426
Plaintiff:
John Robert Sellers , Jr
Defendant:
Kazm, Hass and BOP Psychiatrist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wherry v. Bennett, et al
as 12-2337
Appellant:
BENJAMIN J. WHERRY
Defendant:
LISA LIASON, BENNETT, FMC Devens Education Staff Member, THOMAS KANE, BOP Acting Director for Department of Justice and others
Appellee:
CHAPMAN, Records Office Supervisor, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, GALLANT, Case Manager for FMC Devens H-Unit and others
Smolka v. US, et al
as 10-1544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. SMOLKA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, REGINALD BARNETT, M.D. and others
Cardona-Sandoval v. Ledezma, et al
as 09-2191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN CARDONA-SANDOVAL
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL and BOP DIRECTOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. LEDEZMA, DR. RIVERA, DR. MEDINA and others
Ruston v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 09-2167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAROLYN A. SABOL, in her individual and official capacities as BOP Warden, GARY H. RIGGS, in his individual and official capacities as Staff Psychiatrist and others
Cardona-Sandoval v. US Attorney General, et al
as 07-2475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN CARDONA-SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, BOP DIRECTOR, MR. LEDEZMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
