Cases 21 - 30 of 78
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLANDING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv01115
Defendant:
UNKOWN BOP CORRECTION OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNKNOWN BUEAU OF PRISONS MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL BLANDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRETCU v. FEDERAL BOP et al
as 3:2020cv00179
Defendant:
GEO/MVCC, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BOP
Plaintiff:
GHEORGHE STRETCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v BOP Medical Staff, et al
as 1:2020cv01083
In Re:
William Kiki Andrews
Defendant:
BOP Medical Staff, Scott Finley, Dr. Ellen Mace Leibson and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Credico v. Lyons et al
as 3:2019cv01097
Defendant:
Unknown John/Jane Doe FBI Agents, Unknown BOP I.T. Offc., S.I.S. Offc Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Credico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SLOAN v. BOP
as 2:2019cv00227
Respondent:
BOP
Petitioner:
ALAN TODD SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Case Manager A. Foura-White, Nurse K. Williams, Counselor Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dorsey, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco Serrano v. Unknown BOP Employees
as 3:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serrano
Defendant:
Unknown BOP employees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
