Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00712
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Terence Sasaki v. Mark Inch, et al
as 19-16519
Defendant / Appellee:
DUTTON, C/O, FSL - Elkton, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY CLERK(S), NERO, SCHMIDT, CSO, FSL - Elkton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERENCE SASAKI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Hugh Hurwitz, et al
as 19-35512
Defendant / Appellee:
HUGH J. HURWITZ, BOP Director, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, Deputy Attorney General and JOSIAS SALAZAR, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.
Nigel Nicholas Douglas v. BOP Director et al
as 5:2019cv01015
Defendant:
Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Williams, Jr. v. DOJ, et al
as 19-16077
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLEY HARRINGTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
Douglas v. BOP Director et al
as 3:2019cv00822
Defendant:
Melix, Unknown Others, Villanueva and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Williams, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 19-15627
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLEY HARRINGTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID VERDEN WILLIAMS, Jr.
Williams, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, BOP Warden of FDC Honolulu and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
David Verden Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
