Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Hils v. Warden, FPC Alderson
as 1:2019cv00175
Respondent:
BOP - Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Ann Marie Hils
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Mark S. Inch, B. Von Blankensee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Mark S. Inch, B. Von Blankensee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samules and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. BOP
as 3:2015cv00119
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Latham v. BOP-Warden Masters/Williams et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Petitioner:
K. Latham
Respondent:
BOP-Warden Masters/Williams, BOP-DHO Devereaux and BOP-C.O. B. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. United States et al
as 1:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Jones
Defendant:
United States, BOP Agency, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Defendant:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Board of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holiday v. DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP et al
as 5:2015cv00016
Petitioner:
Daud Abdullah Holiday
Respondent:
DHO Disciplinary Hearing Bord of BOP, T. Lane, T. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frye v. BOP Staff et al
as 3:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Matthew Frye, Jr.
Defendant:
BOP Staff, Jr. Bell, Counselor Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
