Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MILLER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04762
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MILLER and TONYA CRAWLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DETECTIVE BOVA, DETECTIVE JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03054
Defendant:
RICHARD BOVA, John Bell, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
John L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al
as 2:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
HEATH EVANS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MONROEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Bova
as 4:2015cv02031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tobias C. Bova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
United States of America v. Bova
as 3:2015cv02031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tobias C. Bova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY et al
as 2:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY, JOHN DOE, JOSEPH AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOCHENDONER et al v. GENZYME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
ANITA HOCHENDONER , EARL HOCHENDONER , ANITA BOVA and others
Defendant:
GENZYME CORPORATION and MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SOURBRINE v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2010cv06847
Petitioner:
HENRY SOURBRINE
Respondent:
LOUIS GIORLA, WILLIS BERRY, JR., ELLEN GREEN CEISLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOVA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53943
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BOVA, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
