Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BOWEN v. HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
as 1:2023cv01981
Plaintiff: FEKRA BOWEN
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
2620 BOWEN, LLC v. INTER-STATE GYPSUM FLOOR, LLC
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff: 2620 BOWEN, LLC
Defendant: INTER-STATE GYPSUM FLOOR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv00227
Not Classified By Court: 2620 BOWEN, LLC and INTER-STATE GYPSUM FLOOR, LLC
Plaintiff: NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02518
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BEIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv02160
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BEIN, BRIAN BENGIER, JUSTIN BISCIAIO and others
Not Classified By Court: RHONDA COMSTOCK, KC BROWN, KYLE BROWN and others
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
RASMUSSEN v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02059
Plaintiff: Dylan Rasmussen
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKERSON v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Plaintiff: Jhaquille Hankerson
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01122
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?