Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BOUYE JR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE JR v. DOE'S
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant: JOHN'S AND JANE'S DOE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE JR v. MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 'CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT' et al
as 1:2023cv00614
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant: MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 'CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT' and KELLY M. BAUDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE JR v. SWEENEY II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant: JAMES R. SWEENEY II, KATHERINE A. CORNELIUS and J. NIEDERHELMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford Bouye, Jr. v. Dennis Reagle
as 23-1429
Petitioner / Appellant: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
BOUYE JR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00329
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant: ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00022
Petitioner: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOUYE v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Respondent: D. REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOUYE v. WARDEN
as 1:2021cv02999
Petitioner: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOUYE v. HOWARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02968
Plaintiff: BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE, JR.
Defendant: T. HOWARD, MARTZ, COOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?