Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Guo v. Tomkiewicz et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Hongnian Guo
Defendant:
Brandon Tomkiewicz and Amy Huff-Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. v. Bauch
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Bauch
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Kinard v. The City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kinard
Defendant:
Gianna Petrone, The City of Pawtucket, The Miriam Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brandon et al v. City of Cranston et al
as 1:2020cv00155
Defendant:
City of Cranston and International Brotherhood of Police Officers, Local 301
Plaintiff:
Ryan Shore, Mark Campopiano, Justin Rutkiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zone Five, LLC et al v. Textron, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00393
Plaintiff:
BTICG Leasing, Inc., Jay Elliott, Tim Van Every and others
Defendant:
Textron Aviation, Inc. and Textron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. City of Cranston, et al
as 1:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
Keith Reynolds
Defendant:
David Cragin, Brandon Scotti, City of Cranston, by and through its Treasurer, David Capuano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00229
Plaintiff:
Brandon Higgins
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance, Inc. and Evergreen Auto Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cota v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00481
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cota
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pure Haven Essentials, L.L.C. v. Minks
as 1:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Pure Haven Essentials, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Brandon Minks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
