Cases 1 - 10 of 78
BRANDT et al v. GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRANDT and ANNETTE BRANDT
Defendant:
GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRANDT v. AETNA HEALTH, INC.
as 2:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
MELISSA D. BRANDT
Defendant:
AETNA HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Mark Brandt and Corey Schwalm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
BRANDT v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
FLOYD BRANDT
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WYNKOOP v. AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2022cv00814
Plaintiff:
HARRY WYNKOOP
Defendant:
AVONWORTH SCHOOL DISTRICT, DR. JEFF HADLEY, YU-LING CHENG-BEHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AH et al v. GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
AH, CH and JH
Defendant:
GARNET VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, VINCENT CITARELLI and STEPHEN BRANDT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Brandt v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Brandt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Stover v. Newberry Township et al
as 1:2021cv01445
Plaintiff:
Kurt D. Stover and Kurtis D. Stover
Defendant:
Newberry Township, Scott J. Gross, Steve Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
