Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Champagne v. State of Oregon
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Champagne
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Christine Landers, Brian Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bliss et al v. Adewusi et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Nigel Bliss, Dayna Bliss, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Adebimpe Adewusi, Keyvan Abtin, Patrick Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bray v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harry Bray
Defendant:
State of Oregon, D.O. M. Patton, Dr Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Freud America, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lopez
Defendant:
Freud America, Inc. and William F Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bray v. Judge
as 3:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Mark Judge
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bray v. Laney
as 6:2018cv00917
Petitioner:
Kevin Scott Bray
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bray v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv01897
Plaintiff:
Starlyn C. Bray
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bray v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2016cv01980
Defendant:
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union, American Airlines and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Leonetti v. Bray et al
as 3:2016cv00014
Defendant:
Patrick Bray, Clackamas County, Anthony Kollias and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
