Cases 1 - 10 of 12
KARPINSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS et al
as 3:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES KARPINSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS, WELLPATH, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNKIN v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
NURSE KELLY STEWART, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MEDVA et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET SECURITY DEPT., LT. LINDSEY, CO GIBSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREACHER v. CORRECT CARE SERVICES
as 2:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SERVICES, DR. KROSS, COUNSELOR MICHAEL STELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TATE v. WIGGINS et al
as 3:2018cv00230
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ERIC TICE, JENNIFER MCCLELLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LINDELL TATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
REICHERT v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2018cv00156
Defendant:
DOCTOR ROBINSON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., BRIAN HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REICHERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Foderingham v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Glasco Foderingham
Defendant:
John Wetzel , Paul Noel , Brian Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAINES v. DR. BARNHART et al
as 3:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAM HAINES
Defendant:
DR. BARNHART, ROXY PLAYSO, AMANDA JOHNSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ULLI KLEMM, FAITH AKDEMIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
