Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nesbitt v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 0:2021cv02164
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
Greenville County Dentention Center and Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Greenvill County Detention Center et al
as 0:2020cv04297
Defendant:
John Vandermosten, R. ISreal Hollister, Ofc. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna et al
as 0:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Mr. M. Chartier, Sergeant Francis, Capt. Pendergrass and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Keith Nesbitt v. Tim Riley
as 15-6835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM RILEY, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Directory of the Department of Corrections, AMY SPENCER and others
Brian Nesbitt v. Warden Tyger River Correct
as 15-6814
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Brian Nesbitt v. Warden Tyger River
as 14-7626
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Nesbitt v. Glen et al
as 0:2014cv03510
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
Jenet Glen, James Parris, Gary Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Riley et al
as 0:2014cv02788
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Bryan P Stirling, Amy Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Nesbitt v. SC Department of Correction
as 14-6114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYGER RIVER CI, TIM RILEY, Warden Tyger River Correctional and others
Nesbitt v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2013cv02602
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Nesbitt
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
