Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Andersen et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv12029
Plaintiff:
Cade Andersen, Alvin Arguello, William Armstrong and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Allstar Fire Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
REDMOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02453
Plaintiff:
BRIAN REDMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REDMOND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49712
Plaintiff:
BRIAN REDMOND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Redmond v. Multnomah County, Oregon, et al
as 20-35732
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Sheriff Michael Reese, MULTNOMAH COUNTY CORRECTIONS HEALTH, Multnomah County, Oregon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN REDMOND
Gibson v. Krywalski et al
as 6:2013cv06158
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Gibson
Defendant:
Joseph Krywalski, Brian Redmond and Mara McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: BL Development Corporation, et al
as 10-60782
Petitioner:
In re: GRAND CASINOS INC, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT, INC, formerly known as Park Place Entertainment Corp and BL DEVELOPMENT CORP, doing business as Grand Casino Tunica, Individually
Respondent:
CRAIG BALL
Plaintiff - Respondent:
DEONNE MAGGETTE, MYRTLE BAILEY, THEOPHILUS CANNON and others
Jacobs et al v. BL Development Corp. et al
as 2:2007cv00182
Plaintiff:
McKinley Jacobs, Isaac Clark, Billy Joe Lyons, Jr. and others
Defendant:
BL Development Corp., Grand Casinos, Inc. and Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
