Cases 1 - 10 of 48
McClellan v. Stirling
as 9:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannon v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv03365
Defendant:
Willie Davis, Falecia McKie, Joel Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Reeves v. Brian Stirling/SCDC
as 0:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Phillip C Reeves
Respondent:
Brian Stirling/SCDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Defendant:
Mr. Nelson, Mr. Canning, Mr. Campisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Stirling et al
as 0:2023cv06978
Plaintiff:
Robert Dexter Thomas, III
Defendant:
Brian Stirling and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Stirling
as 0:2023cv05261
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Defendant:
Brian Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glenn v. Bryan et al
as 6:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Glenn
Defendant:
Ms. Bryan, Brian Stirling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Green v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv03559
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Defendant:
Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwin v. Stirling et al
as 2:2023cv03405
Plaintiff:
Antwon Goodwin
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Ms. A. Stewart, Mr. Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricardo Fishburne v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 23-6358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO FISHBURNE
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A/W ANNE SHEPPARD, BRIAN KENDELL, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
