Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Marcus B. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laccinole v. Gulf Coast Collection Bureau et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Jack Warren Brown, III and Marie S. Areskog
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Brousseau v. Town of Little Compton et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Eric Brousseau
Defendant:
Town of Little Compton, Scott Raynes, Patrick Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Clervrain et al v. Griffin et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Antwaun Griffin, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Diedra Henry-Spires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
Smith v. Brown University
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Brown University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Stiles v. Brown University
as 1:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
John Stiles
Defendant:
Brown University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
