Cases 1 - 10 of 21
RAZUMOV et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv09221
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RAZUMOV and MARIA RAZUMOV
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2016cv08644
Plaintiff:
HAKIM KELLY and ANGELA KELLY
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, ROBERT CHETIRKIN, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv06087
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., ART BREWER, Y. SOLIMAN, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01058
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY, UCHC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SZEMPLE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE INC., UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALLOY v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2009cv01239
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MALLOY
Respondent:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANN MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RIOS v. GLOVER et al
as 2:2008cv04945
Plaintiff:
DANNY RIOS
Defendant:
LARRY GLOVER, BRUCE HAUCK, B. SAPP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MYERS v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2008cv04386
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
BRUCE HAUCK, PAUL MARK, G. WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNORS v. HAUCK et al
as 3:2008cv03940
Petitioner:
CHARLES CONNORS
Respondent:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALLER v. HAUCK et al
as 2:2008cv02716
Petitioner:
AHMAD WALLER
Respondent:
BRUCE HAUCK and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
