Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
MIGLIORI et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 5:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Ms. LINDA MIGLIORI, FRANCIS J. FOX, RICHARD E RICHARDS and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Zac Cohen
Intervenor Defendant:
DAVID RITTER
Amicus Curiae:
BRYAN CUTLER, Kerry Benninghoff, SENATOR JAKE CORMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971 Voting Rights Law
ZICCARELLI v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv01831
Defendant:
BETHANY HALLAM, RICH FITZGERALD, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE ZICCARELLI
Intervenor Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and JAMES BREWSTER
Amicus Curiae:
JAKE CORMAN, KIM L. WARD, KERRY BENNINGHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DELGADO v. SOTO-FIGUEROA et al
as 5:2017cv01041
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DELGADO
Defendant:
COLILE MARIE SOTO-FIGUEROA, EMMANUEL ALEXIS MORALES-VAZQUEZ, MICHAEL E. MCHALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
