Cases 11 - 20 of 2,041
Loyd v. Alvarez, et al.
as 24-2374
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RAY LOYD
Defendant:
V. ALVAREZ, M.D., W. PAYNE and BRYANT, Sgt.
Bristol County Retirement System v. QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
Bristol County Retirement System
Defendant:
QuidelOrtho Corporation f/k/a Quidel Corporation, Douglas Bryant, Joseph Busky and others
United States v. Jonathon Bryant
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant
Hudson-Bryant v. NextGen Leads LLC
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Julius Hudson-Bryant
Defendant:
NextGen Leads LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Andrikos, et al. v. Pacific Maritime Association, et al.
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
EVAGELOS ANDRIKOS, BRYANT BURNS, MICHAEL OLVERA and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY WHEELER
Defendant:
PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION, APM TERMINALS PACIFIC LLC, APS STEVEDORING, LLC and others
The KL Kamholz Joint Revocable Trust v. B. Riley Financial, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02121
Plaintiff:
The KL Kamholz Joint Revocable Trust
Defendant:
B. Riley Financial, Inc., Bryant Riley, Tom Kelleher and others
Petitioner:
Chin Legacy Gift Trust UA DTD and Chong Legacy Gift Trust UA DTD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
