Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Walter v. M.T.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Bryant Walter and Walter Bryant
Defendant:
M.T.C., EMCF Maintenance Dept. Personnel, Unit Manager Derrick Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Kammer
as 3:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Bryant Lemont Harris
Defendant:
G. Dall Kammer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Madison HMA, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00446
Plaintiff:
Crystal F. Tucker
Defendant:
Madison HMA, LLC doing business as Merit Health River Oaks Hospital, Sabrina Bryant and Dr. Carmen Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bryant v. Bogalusa Bayou Railroad LLC/Watco
as 2:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Bryant
Defendant:
Bogalusa Bayou Railroad LLC/Watco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bryant v. Cooley et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Lt. Andre Cooley and Lt. Chiquita Caines
Plaintiff:
James Bryant and James McErnest Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Bert
as 3:2020cv00775
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Brett I Bert
Plaintiff:
Bryant LeMont Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Bryant et al
as 1:2020cv00286
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams and Merlin Kent Williams
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Phil Bryant
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mann v. The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch of Government et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant:
The Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch of Government, Tate Reeves, Jim Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mann
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
