Cases 31 - 40 of 168
BRYANT v. RADDAD
as 2:2021cv01116
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL BRYANT
Defendant:
RADDAD, HANDY, KILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITNEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv03855
Petitioner:
BRYANT K. WHITNEY
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2020cv01051
Defendant:
RN WILLIAMS, JANE DOES, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
MARLYNN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2020cv00462
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, The District Attorney of the County of Erie and Superintendent Michael Clark
Petitioner:
Bryant K. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv01361
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE and MICHAEL CLARK
Petitioner:
BRYANT K. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Ransom et al
as 3:2019cv02101
Petitioner:
Bryant Johnson
Respondent:
. Kevin Ransom, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Kevin Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE et al
as 1:2019cv00329
Defendant:
LT. ROGER HERMANN, KATHY DAHLKEMPER, DEPUTY MICHAEL HOLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE LEON BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Petitioner:
BRYANT JONES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMIE LUTHER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2019cv01166
Plaintiff:
Bryant Wilson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCUTELLA v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv00168
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, AMBER CHAFFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
