Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 23-1034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, DIEGO F. CALDERIN, MICHAEL J. CLEMENT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2906
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Campbell v. Board of Directors of Bryn Mawr Trust Co, et al
as 22-2723
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST CO, BRITTON H. MURDOCH, CHAIRMAN, ANDREA F. GILBERT, DIRECTOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROYAL BANK SUPPLEMENT EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
RUST v. RUST et al
as 7:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
PIMPAKTRA RUST
Defendant:
VINA E RUST, CHAKDHARI A RUST and BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CAMPBELL v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00798
Defendant:
DIEGO F. CALDERIN, KEVIN TYLUS, SCOTT M. JENKINS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BABIY et al v. BRYN MAWR TRUST
as 2:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
P. THEODORE BABIY, ANNE MARIE E. QUINN and DIAMOND DEVELOMNET GROUP
Defendant:
BRYN MAWR TRUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
