Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Griffin v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Bryon L Griffin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Tehum Care Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01361
Plaintiff:
Phillip Buchanan
Defendant:
Tehum Care Services, Inc., Bryon Farmer, Angela Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevius v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
Bryon Burton Nevius
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Millsap & Singer, LLC, Scott D. Mosier and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nevius v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 2:2022mc09001
Plaintiff:
Bryon Burton Nevius
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Nevius et al
as 2:2017cv04205
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Bryon B Nevius, Midwest Land Management, LLC, Joseph W. Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Welton
as 6:2016cv03077
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Bryon Welton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245
Belton et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00220
Plaintiff:
Bryon Belton and Randall Collins
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe Laboratories, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pettijohn v. Zumwalt et al
as 2:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Bryon G. Pettijohn
Defendant:
Nina Zumwalt, James Hurley, Tomes Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
