Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC. v. BELLO et al
as 2:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
Defendant:
ABDUL RAZAK BELLO and SCHNEIDER NATIONAL BULK CARRIERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Health Care Qualty Improvement Act of 1986
HALEY v. BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
as 1:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALEY
Defendant:
BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
PENNENVIRONMENT et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
PENNENVIRONMENT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., BOROUGH OF FORD CITY and BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
PENNENVIRONMENT et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2013cv01395
Plaintiff:
PENNENVIRONMENT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC, BOROUGH OF FORD CITY and BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
PENNENVIRONMENT et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2013cv01396
Plaintiff:
PENNENVIRONMENT and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC, BOROUGH OF FORD CITY and BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United Transportation Union v. Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc., et al
as 6:2009cv06661
Plaintiff:
United Transportation Union
Defendant:
Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc., and Genesee & Wyoming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
FITZGERALD v. BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
as 2:2008cv01534
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN FITZGERALD
Defendant:
BUFFALO & PITTSBURGH RAILROAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leonard L. Thompson, Jr. v. Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc.
as PAE/2:05-CV-00314
Plaintiff:
Leonard L. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
