Cases 41 - 50 of 1,184
Seabrooke v. Inch et al
as 2:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Seabrooke, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark S. Inch and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duhon v. FCI- Coleman Medium et al
as 5:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyrell Duhon
Defendant:
FCI- Coleman Medium and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Billingsley v. Williams et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Karen Williams and Alabama Bureau of Prison and Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GRIFFIS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
MARY BARRETT GRIFFIS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BERRY v. GABBY
as 4:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
SHEENA V BERRY
Respondent:
GABBY, FCI TALLAHASSEE, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Pate v. Bureau of Prisons
as 23-10909
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK PATE
Respondent / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Brian Culver v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 23-10910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN SCOTT CULVER
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Waltz v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Sharon D Waltz
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPIKES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 7:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
LEON BERNARD SPIKES, JR
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
