Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Noyola v. Stiles et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Emilio Noyola
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Stiles, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Lavar Kinnell Ellis
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCallister v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
Justice McCallister
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barber v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
John Does, Judith Lamare, Dewayne Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hendricks et al
as 2:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Hendricks, T Carter, Rosalez and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Brooke Boyles, Hendricks, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
James Sullivan
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin-Bey v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00107
Defendant:
G Rosalez, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Duane Irvin-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Petro et al
as 2:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Does Outside Medical Care, Unknown Health Services Administrators, Clinical Directors, Directors of the BOP (2014-2018), and Unknown Medical Contract Company, Andrew Manos, B K Victor and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marzett Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
