Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Hoenig v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 2:2017cv02238
Petitioner:
Ronald M. Hoenig
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Edge, Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mauldin v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2016cv02674
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Mauldin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moon v. Fulgam et al
as 3:2016cv01866
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Michelle Fulgam, Phoenix Doris, Kenneth Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Batts et al
as 2:2016cv02372
Plaintiff:
Damien Hughes
Defendant:
Myron Batts, Stevenson, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballentine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2016cv02230
Plaintiff:
Torrence Ballentine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Myron Batts and Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settle v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Douglas Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. United State Parole Commission et al
as 1:2015cv01273
Petitioner:
Gary William Holt
Respondent:
United State Parole Commission, United States Department of Probation and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McFarland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Philander McFarland
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settle v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Don Montrail Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew W. Mellady- Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Glimer, Blanche B. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
