Cases 21 - 30 of 169
Stahmer v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2021cv00605
Petitioner:
Justin Stahmer
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carrusco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrusco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodall v. City of Richmond, et al.
as 3:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Erick Timothy Goodall
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Richmond City Jail Detention, United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Saunders et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
PGB Hanger, LLC. and Mr. James Saunders, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Allee v. Barr et al
as 7:2021cv00084
Defendant:
The House Senate, Corrections Information Council Office, Washington, DC, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Allee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TSO v. WESTER et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 40, RON WESTER, Mark Bolster, Acting Warden and others
Plaintiff:
EARLSON TSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Garcia v. U. S. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2020cv00629
Defendant:
All Officers, U. S. Department of Justice, Officer Bledsoe and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
