Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Richardson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
Theordore Richardson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murray v. Sage et al
as 3:2022cv00144
Petitioner:
Shawn Kendall Murray
Respondent:
J. Sage and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hooker v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carl Nelson Hooker
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department Of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Murray v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Shawn K. Murray
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wesley v. McCaffrey et al
as 5:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Michael Wesley
Respondent:
Warden Ryan McCaffrey and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
George v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Romancee Oshay George
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado-Valois v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
as 5:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hurtado-Valois
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Duerson v. McCaffrey
as 5:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
Anthony Duerson
Respondent:
Ryan McCaffrey and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bud Pratt Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
