Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Burgess et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01373
Plaintiff: Matthew Burgess and Sharon J. Burgess
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Burgess v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00594
Petitioner: Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03773
Petitioner: Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01496
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burgess v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00387
Chairse et al v. State of Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00355
Plaintiff: O'Shea Chairse and Sean Burgess
Defendant: Department of Human Service State of Minnesota, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services, State of Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. Warden of Rochester FMC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02363
Petitioner: Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent: Warden of Rochester FMC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?