Cases 1 - 10 of 130
SPENCER et al v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SPENCER, SCOTT CHANG, JESSICA BURGESS and others
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hernandez et al v. Burgess
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Jose Lemus Hernandez, Karla Lopez De Lemus and K.L.L
Defendant:
Joseph Reed Burgess, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jenner v. Pimm et al
as 3:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Jenner
Defendant:
Trooper Gregory Pimm, Trooper Blade Bernosky, Corporal Jacob Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURGESS v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2023cv01113
Petitioner:
ROBERT LAMONT BURGESS
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Timmons v. Burgess et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
Lawrence Burgess, Dr. Scott Prince and Kimberly Lux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
