Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
as 24-953
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BUSH
Defendant: RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION
Bush v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
as 24-913
Respondent: ANTHONY BUSH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Petitioner: RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION
Bush v. Johnson
as 23-2049
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIE R. BUSH
Respondent / Appellee: TRACEY JOHNSON
Daniel Verduzco v. Mickey Price, et al
as 23-15127
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL VERDUZCO
Defendant / Appellee: MICKEY PRICE, Chief Mental Health Psychologist, R. LIMON, Chief Psychologist, HANNAH E. BUSH and others
Rika Shimizu v. USDC-HI
as 22-70196
Not Classified By Court: In re: RIKA SHIMIZU, MINA TAKAMURA, RIKUTA TAKAMURA and others
Petitioner: RIKA SHIMIZU
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Maria Sicinska v. George Bush, et al
as 22-55601
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIA SICINSKA
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE W. BUSH, GEORGE W. HANDY, GOOGLE and others
Rika Shimizu v. Mina Takamura, et al
as 22-15312
Plaintiff / Appellant: RIKA SHIMIZU
Defendant / Appellee: MINA TAKAMURA, RIKUTA TAKAMURA, TAKESHI NAMBU and others
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 22-55139
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee: THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Defendant: E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and JAMES E. TILTON
Charles Caston v. Houston Police Department, et al
as 21-17086
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES CASTON
Defendant / Appellee: HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD J. TRUMP, MARK ZUCKERBERG and others
Keyron Binns v. AGL, et al
as 21-16854
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEYRON LAMONTE BINNS
Defendant / Appellee: AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, AIG, CANDY JOHNSON, Analyst, SHARITA DOUGLAS-LANE, Analyst and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?