Cases 1 - 10 of 115
DHARIA v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05915
Plaintiff:
RAJESH DHARIA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, FBI, DAVID HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Gerald Bush v. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority, et al
as 24-1284
Plaintiff:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, CHRISTI M. JACKSON and ROBERT LABRUM
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HACKETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2023cv23181
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL HACKETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BARRY BUSH, JOHN JUPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WALLER v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2023cv20429
Plaintiff:
KAREN WALLER
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, CHRIS CHRISTIE, JON CORZINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gerald Bush v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 23-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GOVERNMENT AND RDA and PHILADELPHIA REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BUSH-ROWLAND v. BENDER et al
as 1:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BUSH-ROWLAND
Defendant:
JEFFREY BRIAN BENDER and ROBERT H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
