Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Dugger et al v. McCormick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03912
Plaintiff: Dugger, John Dugger, Jr., Melody Natishin and others
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation, Hampshire Industries, Inc., The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and others
Cross Defendant: Eaton Hydraulics, Inc., Jenkins Valves, Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: The William Powell Company
3Rd Party Defendant: Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Smith et al v. MCIC, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02484
Plaintiff: Marvin W. Smith and Patricia Smith
Defendant: MCIC, Inc. , Robert I. McCormick , Elizabeth McCormick and others
Cross_claimant: Tate Engineering Systems, Inc. , CBS Corporation , Howden Buffalo, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: A.O. Smith Corporation, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: General Refractories Co., Hopeman Brothers , Manville Trust Personal Injury Settlement Trust and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , MCIC, Inc. , Crown, Cork and Seal Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erik Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant: ERIK ROSS PHILLIPS and TINA LANDERS, spouse
Plaintiff: GINA PHILLIPS, spouse
Defendant - Appellee: PNEUMO ABEX, LLC, a/k/a Abex Corporation, f/k/a American Brake Shoe Company, f/k/a American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, American Brakeblok Division and REDDAWAY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ASTENJOHNSON, INC., B E & K INC. and others
Schreiber v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01482
Plaintiff: Dorothy Schreiber
Defendant: AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , A.O. Smith Corporation , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patrick v. Detroit Stoker Company et al
as 4:2011cv00148
Plaintiff: Mary E Patrick
Defendant: Detroit Stoker Company, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Rapid American Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISENHOUR v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00927
Plaintiff: LOUISE H. ISENHOUR
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ASTENJOHNSON, INC., AURORA PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWERS v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00852
Plaintiff: REBA S BOWERS
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AURORA PUMP, BLACKMER PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HINSON v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00853
Plaintiff: LOIS MORTON HINSON
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AURORA PUMP, BLACKMER PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WAGONER v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00850
Plaintiff: LINDA WATSON WAGONER
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AURORA PUMP, BLACKMER PUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright, Sr. et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00152
Plaintiff: Donald Robert Wright, Sr. and Nancy Smith Wright
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Albany International Corp. Successor in Interest to Mount Vernon Group d/b/a Mount Vernon Dryer Fabrics, Albany International Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?