Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adler Bach LLC v. Chelan County
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Adler Bach, LLC
Defendant:
Chelan County
Counter Defendant:
Adler Bach LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reynolds v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
Raquel Reynolds
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Seattle Police Department, Pete Cavinta, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bach v. Uttecht
as 3:2019cv05481
Petitioner:
Daniel Benjamin Bach
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jeffrey A Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bach v. State of Washington
as 4:2019cv05142
Petitioner:
Daniel Benjamin Bach
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schroeder et al v. Ocwen Loan Services LLC
as 2:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Vu Schroeder and My Le Thi Bach
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
WMI Liquidating Trust v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01706
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Susan C. Allison and others
Plaintiff:
WMI Liquidating Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bach v. Bambaren et al
as 2:2009cv01787
Plaintiff:
Richard Bach and Richard Bach
Defendant:
Sergio Bambaren and Hay House Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v. Bach et al
as 2:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant:
Leann R Bach, Julia M Bailey, Ron V Black and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
