Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PROFESSIONAL BACKLINE COMPANY, LLC v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2021cv02467
Plaintiff:
PROFESSIONAL BACKLINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BACKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84043
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LEIF BACKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADERHOLDT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01382
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey, Daniel Bright, Daniel Conley and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aderholdt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00988
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey, Daniel Bright, Daniel Conley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Backlin v. United Services Assurance Association
as 0:2017cv04543
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Backlin
Defendant:
United Services Assurance Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Knapp v. James Tilton, et al
as 12-17684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, MICHAEL S. EVANS, ARCEO and others
Eric Knapp v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-17725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, MICHAEL S. EVANS, ARCEO and others
Sanchez v. Mclean et al
as 2:2010cv02686
Plaintiff:
Manuel Sanchez
Defendant:
Mclean, N. Grannis, A. Simons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Walters v. M. Evans, et al
as 10-15890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM WALTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
M. EVANS, Warden, CHARLES LEE, Chief Medical Officer, REYNALDO CORDERO, Medical Doctor and others
Alfred Backlin v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-69439
Defendant:
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co
Plaintiff:
Alfred Backlin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
