Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bacon v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12057
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan also known as d/b/a BCBSM, d and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Doing business as BCBSM
Plaintiff:
Renee Bacon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson et al v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv11601
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
Anita Victory, Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Caldwell v. Stokely-Hamden et al
as 2:2022cv12233
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Caldwell
Defendant:
Stokely-Hamden, N.P. Penea, Rhonda Bacon and others
Bacon v. Commissioner of Social Social Security
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bacon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Bacon v. Midwestern Pet Food Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Antwan Williams Bacon
Defendant:
Midwestern Pet Food Inc. and Dowagiac Tractor Supply Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11331
Plaintiff:
Joe Stern, Brent Cook, Judy Brown and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Sandusky v. Albers et al
as 2:2018cv11533
Defendant:
Waldis Johnson, Tawaina Craig, W Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sandusky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bacon v. Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, PC et al
as 2:2018cv10348
Plaintiff:
Margaret A Bacon
Defendant:
Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, PC, Lockwood Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A Daly Company and others
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. Westborn Chrysler Jeep Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv13006
Plaintiff:
AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY and Depositors Insurance Company
Defendant:
Westborn Chrysler Jeep Inc., Frank T. Bentley, Jeffrey Alan Roekle, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
